<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Garg Garg &amp; Associates</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gargraghav.in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gargraghav.in</link>
	<description>Chartered Accountants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 21:58:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>ITR-BN: The New Return Form for Block Assessments</title>
		<link>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/31/itr-bn-the-new-return-form-for-block-assessments/</link>
					<comments>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/31/itr-bn-the-new-return-form-for-block-assessments/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raghav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 21:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/31/itr-bn-the-new-return-form-for-block-assessments/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITR-BN: The New Return Form for Block Assessments     What CBDT has done: On 24 July 2026, CBDT has notified the Income-tax (Third Amendment) Rules, 2026 (Notification 97/2026), introducing Form ITR-BN for block assessment in search and requisition cases. It is deemed effective from 1 April 2026, so it already governs every search initiated&#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ITR-BN: The New Return Form for Block Assessments     What CBDT has done: On 24 July 2026, CBDT has notified the Income-tax (Third Amendment) Rules, 2026 (Notification 97/2026), introducing Form ITR-BN for block assessment in search and requisition cases. It is deemed effective from 1 April 2026, so it already governs every search initiated&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/2026/08/itr-bn-the-new-return-form-for-block-assessments/">ITR-BN: The New Return Form for Block Assessments</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/">The Tax Talk</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/31/itr-bn-the-new-return-form-for-block-assessments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Gift Has Changed Hands-But Has Its Tax History Also Changed?</title>
		<link>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/31/the-gift-has-changed-hands-but-has-its-tax-history-also-changed/</link>
					<comments>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/31/the-gift-has-changed-hands-but-has-its-tax-history-also-changed/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raghav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 21:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/31/the-gift-has-changed-hands-but-has-its-tax-history-also-changed/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Gift Has Changed Hands-But Has Its Tax History Also Changed?     Last week, I shared an interesting conversation over my morning cup of tea with a relative whose nephew was proposing to gift him an immovable property having a stamp-duty value of ₹1.65 crore. The gift was to be made through a registered gift deed,&#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Gift Has Changed Hands-But Has Its Tax History Also Changed?     Last week, I shared an interesting conversation over my morning cup of tea with a relative whose nephew was proposing to gift him an immovable property having a stamp-duty value of ₹1.65 crore. The gift was to be made through a registered gift deed,&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/2026/08/the-gift-has-changed-hands-but-has-its-tax-history-also-changed/">The Gift Has Changed Hands-But Has Its Tax History Also Changed?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/">The Tax Talk</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/31/the-gift-has-changed-hands-but-has-its-tax-history-also-changed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anonymous Donations Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Cash Credits Merely Because Donor Identity Is Unknown: ITAT</title>
		<link>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/29/anonymous-donations-cannot-be-treated-as-unexplained-cash-credits-merely-because-donor-identity-is-unknown-itat/</link>
					<comments>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/29/anonymous-donations-cannot-be-treated-as-unexplained-cash-credits-merely-because-donor-identity-is-unknown-itat/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raghav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 21:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/29/anonymous-donations-cannot-be-treated-as-unexplained-cash-credits-merely-because-donor-identity-is-unknown-itat/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Anonymous Donations Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Cash Credits Merely Because Donor Identity Is Unknown: ITAT   Vishakhapatnam ITAT holds that where a Section 12A trust treats anonymous donations as taxable under Section 115BBC, absence of donor particulars cannot automatically trigger Section 68 and Section 115BBE Can a charitable trust receive an anonymous donation, offer&#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous Donations Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Cash Credits Merely Because Donor Identity Is Unknown: ITAT   Vishakhapatnam ITAT holds that where a Section 12A trust treats anonymous donations as taxable under Section 115BBC, absence of donor particulars cannot automatically trigger Section 68 and Section 115BBE Can a charitable trust receive an anonymous donation, offer&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/2026/08/anonymous-donations-cannot-be-treated-as-unexplained-cash-credits-merely-because-donor-identity-is-unknown-itat/">Anonymous Donations Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Cash Credits Merely Because Donor Identity Is Unknown: ITAT</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/">The Tax Talk</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/29/anonymous-donations-cannot-be-treated-as-unexplained-cash-credits-merely-because-donor-identity-is-unknown-itat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITR Deadline 31 August 2026: Points to remember-</title>
		<link>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/29/itr-deadline-31-august-2026-points-to-remember/</link>
					<comments>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/29/itr-deadline-31-august-2026-points-to-remember/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raghav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 21:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/29/itr-deadline-31-august-2026-points-to-remember/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITR Deadline 31 August 2026: Points to remember-     31st August is not an extension of due date. The Finance Act, 2026 has substituted Explanation 2 to Section 139(1) with effect from 1 March 2026. 1.  The calendar: 31 July 2026 due date applied to assessees with no PGBP income and no audit liability,&#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ITR Deadline 31 August 2026: Points to remember-     31st August is not an extension of due date. The Finance Act, 2026 has substituted Explanation 2 to Section 139(1) with effect from 1 March 2026. 1.  The calendar: 31 July 2026 due date applied to assessees with no PGBP income and no audit liability,&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/2026/08/itr-deadline-31-august-2026-points-to-remember/">ITR Deadline 31 August 2026: Points to remember-</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/">The Tax Talk</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/29/itr-deadline-31-august-2026-points-to-remember/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 80P Deduction Can Be Claimed During Assessment Proceedings Even If Not Claimed in ITR: ITAT</title>
		<link>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/28/section-80p-deduction-can-be-claimed-during-assessment-proceedings-even-if-not-claimed-in-itr-itat/</link>
					<comments>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/28/section-80p-deduction-can-be-claimed-during-assessment-proceedings-even-if-not-claimed-in-itr-itat/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raghav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 21:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/28/section-80p-deduction-can-be-claimed-during-assessment-proceedings-even-if-not-claimed-in-itr-itat/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Section 80P Deduction Can Be Claimed During Assessment Proceedings Even If Not Claimed in ITR: ITAT   Pune ITAT holds that for AY 2015-16, delayed or additional claim of Section 80P deduction could not be rejected merely because it was not made in the original return; Section 80AC amendment was prospective Can a cooperative society&#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Section 80P Deduction Can Be Claimed During Assessment Proceedings Even If Not Claimed in ITR: ITAT   Pune ITAT holds that for AY 2015-16, delayed or additional claim of Section 80P deduction could not be rejected merely because it was not made in the original return; Section 80AC amendment was prospective Can a cooperative society&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/2026/08/section-80p-deduction-can-be-claimed-during-assessment-proceedings-even-if-not-claimed-in-itr-itat/">Section 80P Deduction Can Be Claimed During Assessment Proceedings Even If Not Claimed in ITR: ITAT</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/">The Tax Talk</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/28/section-80p-deduction-can-be-claimed-during-assessment-proceedings-even-if-not-claimed-in-itr-itat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CIT(E) Must Specify the Exact “Specified Violation” Before Cancelling Trust Registration: ITAT Mumbai</title>
		<link>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/28/cite-must-specify-the-exact-specified-violation-before-cancelling-trust-registration-itat-mumbai/</link>
					<comments>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/28/cite-must-specify-the-exact-specified-violation-before-cancelling-trust-registration-itat-mumbai/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raghav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 21:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/28/cite-must-specify-the-exact-specified-violation-before-cancelling-trust-registration-itat-mumbai/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CIT(E) Must Specify the Exact “Specified Violation” Before Cancelling Trust Registration: ITAT Mumbai     Vague allegations cannot justify cancellation of charitable trust registration; taxpayer must know the precise violation and material relied upon Registration under section 12A/12AB is extremely important for a charitable or religious institution because it forms the foundation for claiming exemption&#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CIT(E) Must Specify the Exact “Specified Violation” Before Cancelling Trust Registration: ITAT Mumbai     Vague allegations cannot justify cancellation of charitable trust registration; taxpayer must know the precise violation and material relied upon Registration under section 12A/12AB is extremely important for a charitable or religious institution because it forms the foundation for claiming exemption&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/2026/08/cite-must-specify-the-exact-specified-violation-before-cancelling-trust-registration-itat-mumbai/">CIT(E) Must Specify the Exact “Specified Violation” Before Cancelling Trust Registration: ITAT Mumbai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/">The Tax Talk</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/28/cite-must-specify-the-exact-specified-violation-before-cancelling-trust-registration-itat-mumbai/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 50C Cannot Reduce Section 54F Exemption: ITAT Chennai</title>
		<link>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/27/section-50c-cannot-reduce-section-54f-exemption-itat-chennai/</link>
					<comments>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/27/section-50c-cannot-reduce-section-54f-exemption-itat-chennai/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raghav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 21:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/27/section-50c-cannot-reduce-section-54f-exemption-itat-chennai/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Section 50C Cannot Reduce Section 54F Exemption: ITAT Chennai   Stamp duty value cannot replace actual sale consideration for computing “net consideration” under Section 54F; full exemption allowed where entire actual consideration was reinvested Can the Income Tax Department say that you have to invest ₹4.64 crore in a new house merely because the stamp valuation authority&#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Section 50C Cannot Reduce Section 54F Exemption: ITAT Chennai   Stamp duty value cannot replace actual sale consideration for computing “net consideration” under Section 54F; full exemption allowed where entire actual consideration was reinvested Can the Income Tax Department say that you have to invest ₹4.64 crore in a new house merely because the stamp valuation authority&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/2026/08/section-50c-cannot-reduce-section-54f-exemption-itat-chennai/">Section 50C Cannot Reduce Section 54F Exemption: ITAT Chennai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/">The Tax Talk</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/27/section-50c-cannot-reduce-section-54f-exemption-itat-chennai/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 43CA Cannot Be Applied to Land Sale Agreed Before Its Introduction: ITAT Jaipur</title>
		<link>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/26/section-43ca-cannot-be-applied-to-land-sale-agreed-before-its-introduction-itat-jaipur/</link>
					<comments>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/26/section-43ca-cannot-be-applied-to-land-sale-agreed-before-its-introduction-itat-jaipur/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raghav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 21:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/26/section-43ca-cannot-be-applied-to-land-sale-agreed-before-its-introduction-itat-jaipur/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Section 43CA Cannot Be Applied to Land Sale Agreed Before Its Introduction: ITAT Jaipur   Where agreement to sell was executed before section 43CA came into force and substantial consideration was received through banking channels, subsequent registration could not trigger stamp-duty valuation provisions Can the Income Tax Department invoke section 43CA merely because a piece of land&#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Section 43CA Cannot Be Applied to Land Sale Agreed Before Its Introduction: ITAT Jaipur   Where agreement to sell was executed before section 43CA came into force and substantial consideration was received through banking channels, subsequent registration could not trigger stamp-duty valuation provisions Can the Income Tax Department invoke section 43CA merely because a piece of land&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/2026/08/section-43ca-cannot-be-applied-to-land-sale-agreed-before-its-introduction-itat-jaipur/">Section 43CA Cannot Be Applied to Land Sale Agreed Before Its Introduction: ITAT Jaipur</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/">The Tax Talk</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/26/section-43ca-cannot-be-applied-to-land-sale-agreed-before-its-introduction-itat-jaipur/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can a CA Claim Section 44ADA on Remuneration Received as a Working Partner? ITAT Delhi Says Yes</title>
		<link>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/26/can-a-ca-claim-section-44ada-on-remuneration-received-as-a-working-partner-itat-delhi-says-yes/</link>
					<comments>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/26/can-a-ca-claim-section-44ada-on-remuneration-received-as-a-working-partner-itat-delhi-says-yes/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raghav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 21:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/26/can-a-ca-claim-section-44ada-on-remuneration-received-as-a-working-partner-itat-delhi-says-yes/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can a CA Claim Section 44ADA on Remuneration Received as a Working Partner? ITAT Delhi Says Yes   Partner remuneration of ₹27 lakh can qualify for presumptive taxation under section 44ADA where the assessee is a qualified professional Can a Chartered Accountant who is a working partner in a CA firm claim presumptive taxation under section 44ADA on remuneration&#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can a CA Claim Section 44ADA on Remuneration Received as a Working Partner? ITAT Delhi Says Yes   Partner remuneration of ₹27 lakh can qualify for presumptive taxation under section 44ADA where the assessee is a qualified professional Can a Chartered Accountant who is a working partner in a CA firm claim presumptive taxation under section 44ADA on remuneration&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/2026/08/can-a-ca-claim-section-44ada-on-remuneration-received-as-a-working-partner-itat-delhi-says-yes/">Can a CA Claim Section 44ADA on Remuneration Received as a Working Partner? ITAT Delhi Says Yes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/">The Tax Talk</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/26/can-a-ca-claim-section-44ada-on-remuneration-received-as-a-working-partner-itat-delhi-says-yes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failure to Initiate Section 270A Penalty Cannot Alone Justify Section 263 Revision: ITAT Ahmedabad</title>
		<link>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/25/failure-to-initiate-section-270a-penalty-cannot-alone-justify-section-263-revision-itat-ahmedabad/</link>
					<comments>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/25/failure-to-initiate-section-270a-penalty-cannot-alone-justify-section-263-revision-itat-ahmedabad/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raghav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 21:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/25/failure-to-initiate-section-270a-penalty-cannot-alone-justify-section-263-revision-itat-ahmedabad/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Failure to Initiate Section 270A Penalty Cannot Alone Justify Section 263 Revision: ITAT Ahmedabad   PCIT cannot revise an assessment merely because AO did not initiate penalty proceedings when no under-reported income was actually established Can an Assessing Officer’s failure to initiate penalty proceedings under section 270A make an assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interests&#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Failure to Initiate Section 270A Penalty Cannot Alone Justify Section 263 Revision: ITAT Ahmedabad   PCIT cannot revise an assessment merely because AO did not initiate penalty proceedings when no under-reported income was actually established Can an Assessing Officer’s failure to initiate penalty proceedings under section 270A make an assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interests&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/2026/08/failure-to-initiate-section-270a-penalty-cannot-alone-justify-section-263-revision-itat-ahmedabad/">Failure to Initiate Section 270A Penalty Cannot Alone Justify Section 263 Revision: ITAT Ahmedabad</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/">The Tax Talk</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gargraghav.in/2026/08/25/failure-to-initiate-section-270a-penalty-cannot-alone-justify-section-263-revision-itat-ahmedabad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
