<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Garg Garg &amp; Associates</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gargraghav.in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gargraghav.in</link>
	<description>Chartered Accountants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 21:05:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>10% Deposit for Stay of Demand in Budget 2026 – Full Analysis, Applicability &#038; Strategy</title>
		<link>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/16/10-deposit-for-stay-of-demand-in-budget-2026-full-analysis-applicability-strategy/</link>
					<comments>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/16/10-deposit-for-stay-of-demand-in-budget-2026-full-analysis-applicability-strategy/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raghav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 21:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/16/10-deposit-for-stay-of-demand-in-budget-2026-full-analysis-applicability-strategy/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[10% Deposit for Stay of Demand in Budget 2026 – Full Analysis, Applicability &#38; Strategy   Budget 2026 proposes reducing stay of demand deposit from 20% to 10% under Section 220(6). Is 10% deposit mandatory for income tax stay? Understand Budget 2026 changes, applicability, retrospective impact, and expert strategy for handling tax demand cases.  &#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10% Deposit for Stay of Demand in Budget 2026 – Full Analysis, Applicability &amp; Strategy   Budget 2026 proposes reducing stay of demand deposit from 20% to 10% under Section 220(6). Is 10% deposit mandatory for income tax stay? Understand Budget 2026 changes, applicability, retrospective impact, and expert strategy for handling tax demand cases.  &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/2026/04/10-deposit-for-stay-of-demand-in-budget-2026-full-analysis-applicability-strategy/">10% Deposit for Stay of Demand in Budget 2026 – Full Analysis, Applicability &amp; Strategy</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/">The Tax Talk</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/16/10-deposit-for-stay-of-demand-in-budget-2026-full-analysis-applicability-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 221 Penalty: When Delay in Tax Payment Becomes Costly</title>
		<link>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/16/section-221-penalty-when-delay-in-tax-payment-becomes-costly/</link>
					<comments>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/16/section-221-penalty-when-delay-in-tax-payment-becomes-costly/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raghav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 21:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/16/section-221-penalty-when-delay-in-tax-payment-becomes-costly/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Section 221 Penalty: When Delay in Tax Payment Becomes Costly   In the complex world of income tax compliance, one of the most frequently misunderstood provisions is Section 221 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Many taxpayers assume that once a demand is raised, delay in payment will only attract interest. However, the law goes&#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Section 221 Penalty: When Delay in Tax Payment Becomes Costly   In the complex world of income tax compliance, one of the most frequently misunderstood provisions is Section 221 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Many taxpayers assume that once a demand is raised, delay in payment will only attract interest. However, the law goes&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/2026/04/section-221-penalty-when-delay-in-tax-payment-becomes-costly/">Section 221 Penalty: When Delay in Tax Payment Becomes Costly</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/">The Tax Talk</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/16/section-221-penalty-when-delay-in-tax-payment-becomes-costly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unsigned ‘Dumb Document’ Not Incriminating Material – 153C Proceedings Quashed</title>
		<link>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/16/unsigned-dumb-document-not-incriminating-material-153c-proceedings-quashed/</link>
					<comments>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/16/unsigned-dumb-document-not-incriminating-material-153c-proceedings-quashed/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raghav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 21:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/16/unsigned-dumb-document-not-incriminating-material-153c-proceedings-quashed/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Unsigned ‘Dumb Document’ Not Incriminating Material – 153C Proceedings Quashed     In a significant ruling that strengthens taxpayer protection against mechanical invocation of search provisions, the ITAT Hyderabad has held that proceedings under Section 153C cannot be initiated merely on the basis of an unsigned agreement of sale seized from a third party. The decision reiterates&#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unsigned ‘Dumb Document’ Not Incriminating Material – 153C Proceedings Quashed     In a significant ruling that strengthens taxpayer protection against mechanical invocation of search provisions, the ITAT Hyderabad has held that proceedings under Section 153C cannot be initiated merely on the basis of an unsigned agreement of sale seized from a third party. The decision reiterates&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/2026/04/unsigned-dumb-document-not-incriminating-material-153c-proceedings-quashed/">Unsigned ‘Dumb Document’ Not Incriminating Material – 153C Proceedings Quashed</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/">The Tax Talk</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/16/unsigned-dumb-document-not-incriminating-material-153c-proceedings-quashed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>When 3 Days Delay Travels to ITAT: The Curious Case of Casual Dismissals by CIT(A)</title>
		<link>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/15/when-3-days-delay-travels-to-itat-the-curious-case-of-casual-dismissals-by-cita/</link>
					<comments>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/15/when-3-days-delay-travels-to-itat-the-curious-case-of-casual-dismissals-by-cita/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raghav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 20:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/15/when-3-days-delay-travels-to-itat-the-curious-case-of-casual-dismissals-by-cita/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When 3 Days Delay Travels to ITAT: The Curious Case of Casual Dismissals by CIT(A) In the world of taxation, we often deal with crores, complex interpretations, and high-stakes litigation. But sometimes, the system throws up situations so ironic that they almost read like satire. Imagine this: An assessee files an appeal with a delay of&#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When 3 Days Delay Travels to ITAT: The Curious Case of Casual Dismissals by CIT(A) In the world of taxation, we often deal with crores, complex interpretations, and high-stakes litigation. But sometimes, the system throws up situations so ironic that they almost read like satire. Imagine this: An assessee files an appeal with a delay of&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/2026/04/when-3-days-delay-travels-to-itat-the-curious-case-of-casual-dismissals-by-cita/">When 3 Days Delay Travels to ITAT: The Curious Case of Casual Dismissals by CIT(A)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/">The Tax Talk</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/15/when-3-days-delay-travels-to-itat-the-curious-case-of-casual-dismissals-by-cita/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Section 292BC the Final Nail in the Coffin for Technical Challenges to Assessments?</title>
		<link>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/15/is-section-292bc-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin-for-technical-challenges-to-assessments/</link>
					<comments>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/15/is-section-292bc-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin-for-technical-challenges-to-assessments/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raghav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 20:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/15/is-section-292bc-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin-for-technical-challenges-to-assessments/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Is Section 292BC the Final Nail in the Coffin for Technical Challenges to Assessments? The tax litigation landscape in India has always witnessed a fascinating tug of war between substance and procedure. For years, taxpayers have successfully challenged assessments on technical grounds—especially where statutory approvals were found to be mechanical, hurried, or inadequately reasoned. Enter&#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Section 292BC the Final Nail in the Coffin for Technical Challenges to Assessments? The tax litigation landscape in India has always witnessed a fascinating tug of war between substance and procedure. For years, taxpayers have successfully challenged assessments on technical grounds—especially where statutory approvals were found to be mechanical, hurried, or inadequately reasoned. Enter&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/2026/04/is-section-292bc-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin-for-technical-challenges-to-assessments/">Is Section 292BC the Final Nail in the Coffin for Technical Challenges to Assessments?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/">The Tax Talk</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/15/is-section-292bc-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin-for-technical-challenges-to-assessments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Budget 2026 received President Assent: Key Personal Tax Changes Every Investor Must Act On</title>
		<link>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/14/budget-2026-received-president-assent-key-personal-tax-changes-every-investor-must-act-on/</link>
					<comments>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/14/budget-2026-received-president-assent-key-personal-tax-changes-every-investor-must-act-on/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raghav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 20:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/14/budget-2026-received-president-assent-key-personal-tax-changes-every-investor-must-act-on/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Budget 2026 received President Assent: Key Personal Tax Changes Every Investor Must Act On     The Finance Bill 2026 has now received Presidential assent, and what were earlier “proposals” are now enforceable provisions of law. While the Budget did not tinker much with tax slabs, it has introduced several structural changes that directly impact&#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Budget 2026 received President Assent: Key Personal Tax Changes Every Investor Must Act On     The Finance Bill 2026 has now received Presidential assent, and what were earlier “proposals” are now enforceable provisions of law. While the Budget did not tinker much with tax slabs, it has introduced several structural changes that directly impact&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/2026/04/budget-2026-received-president-assent-key-personal-tax-changes-every-investor-must-act-on/">Budget 2026 received President Assent: Key Personal Tax Changes Every Investor Must Act On</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/">The Tax Talk</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/14/budget-2026-received-president-assent-key-personal-tax-changes-every-investor-must-act-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Agricultural Income in New Income-tax Act, 2025: Tax-Free, But Not Trouble-Free Anymore (Part–4)</title>
		<link>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/13/agricultural-income-in-new-income-tax-act-2025-tax-free-but-not-trouble-free-anymore-part-4/</link>
					<comments>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/13/agricultural-income-in-new-income-tax-act-2025-tax-free-but-not-trouble-free-anymore-part-4/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raghav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 20:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/13/agricultural-income-in-new-income-tax-act-2025-tax-free-but-not-trouble-free-anymore-part-4/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Agricultural Income in New Income-tax Act, 2025: Tax-Free, But Not Trouble-Free Anymore (Part–4)   This article forms Part–4 of my ongoing series on the New Income-tax Act, 2025, where in the last three weeks we have examined various structural and procedural changes introduced in the new law. While many of those changes were more in the nature&#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agricultural Income in New Income-tax Act, 2025: Tax-Free, But Not Trouble-Free Anymore (Part–4)   This article forms Part–4 of my ongoing series on the New Income-tax Act, 2025, where in the last three weeks we have examined various structural and procedural changes introduced in the new law. While many of those changes were more in the nature&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/2026/04/agricultural-income-in-new-income-tax-act-2025-tax-free-but-not-trouble-free-anymore-part-4/">Agricultural Income in New Income-tax Act, 2025: Tax-Free, But Not Trouble-Free Anymore (Part–4)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/">The Tax Talk</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/13/agricultural-income-in-new-income-tax-act-2025-tax-free-but-not-trouble-free-anymore-part-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gujarat High Court pulls up CBDT for 11 years of non-compliance with Court directions on timely release of ITR forms &#038; utilities.</title>
		<link>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/10/gujarat-high-court-pulls-up-cbdt-for-11-years-of-non-compliance-with-court-directions-on-timely-release-of-itr-forms-utilities/</link>
					<comments>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/10/gujarat-high-court-pulls-up-cbdt-for-11-years-of-non-compliance-with-court-directions-on-timely-release-of-itr-forms-utilities/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raghav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 20:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/10/gujarat-high-court-pulls-up-cbdt-for-11-years-of-non-compliance-with-court-directions-on-timely-release-of-itr-forms-utilities/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court pulls up CBDT for 11 years of non-compliance with Court directions on timely release of ITR forms &#38; utilities.         The post Gujarat High Court pulls up CBDT for 11 years of non-compliance with Court directions on timely release of ITR forms &#38; utilities. appeared first on The Tax [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gujarat High Court pulls up CBDT for 11 years of non-compliance with Court directions on timely release of ITR forms &amp; utilities.        </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/2026/04/gujarat-high-court-pulls-up-cbdt-for-11-years-of-non-compliance-with-court-directions-on-timely-release-of-itr-forms-utilities/">Gujarat High Court pulls up CBDT for 11 years of non-compliance with Court directions on timely release of ITR forms &amp; utilities.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/">The Tax Talk</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/10/gujarat-high-court-pulls-up-cbdt-for-11-years-of-non-compliance-with-court-directions-on-timely-release-of-itr-forms-utilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 44AD vs 44ADA: Can Wrong TDS u/s 194J Turn Business Income into Professional Income? A Growing Litigation Issue</title>
		<link>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/09/section-44ad-vs-44ada-can-wrong-tds-u-s-194j-turn-business-income-into-professional-income-a-growing-litigation-issue-2/</link>
					<comments>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/09/section-44ad-vs-44ada-can-wrong-tds-u-s-194j-turn-business-income-into-professional-income-a-growing-litigation-issue-2/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raghav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 19:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/09/section-44ad-vs-44ada-can-wrong-tds-u-s-194j-turn-business-income-into-professional-income-a-growing-litigation-issue-2/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Section 44AD vs 44ADA: Can Wrong TDS u/s 194J Turn Business Income into Professional Income? A Growing Litigation Issue A new and increasingly common controversy is emerging in income tax assessments—Assessing Officers are treating income as “professional income” merely because TDS was deducted under Section 194J, and forcing taxpayers into Section 44ADA instead of Section&#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Section 44AD vs 44ADA: Can Wrong TDS u/s 194J Turn Business Income into Professional Income? A Growing Litigation Issue A new and increasingly common controversy is emerging in income tax assessments—Assessing Officers are treating income as “professional income” merely because TDS was deducted under Section 194J, and forcing taxpayers into Section 44ADA instead of Section&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/2026/04/section-44ad-vs-44ada-can-wrong-tds-u-s-194j-turn-business-income-into-professional-income-a-growing-litigation-issue-2/">Section 44AD vs 44ADA: Can Wrong TDS u/s 194J Turn Business Income into Professional Income? A Growing Litigation Issue</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/">The Tax Talk</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/09/section-44ad-vs-44ada-can-wrong-tds-u-s-194j-turn-business-income-into-professional-income-a-growing-litigation-issue-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 68 Cannot Tax Recorded Sales Again &#124; ITAT Mumbai Rules Against Double Taxation of Turnover</title>
		<link>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/09/section-68-cannot-tax-recorded-sales-again-itat-mumbai-rules-against-double-taxation-of-turnover/</link>
					<comments>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/09/section-68-cannot-tax-recorded-sales-again-itat-mumbai-rules-against-double-taxation-of-turnover/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raghav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 19:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/09/section-68-cannot-tax-recorded-sales-again-itat-mumbai-rules-against-double-taxation-of-turnover/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Section 68 Cannot Tax Recorded Sales Again &#124; ITAT Mumbai Rules Against Double Taxation of Turnover In a significant ruling with wide practical implications, the ITAT Mumbai has clarified that sales already recorded as turnover cannot be taxed again under Section 68 as unexplained cash credit, especially when books of account are not rejected under Section&#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Section 68 Cannot Tax Recorded Sales Again | ITAT Mumbai Rules Against Double Taxation of Turnover In a significant ruling with wide practical implications, the ITAT Mumbai has clarified that sales already recorded as turnover cannot be taxed again under Section 68 as unexplained cash credit, especially when books of account are not rejected under Section&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/2026/04/section-68-cannot-tax-recorded-sales-again-itat-mumbai-rules-against-double-taxation-of-turnover/">Section 68 Cannot Tax Recorded Sales Again | ITAT Mumbai Rules Against Double Taxation of Turnover</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thetaxtalk.com/">The Tax Talk</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gargraghav.in/2026/04/09/section-68-cannot-tax-recorded-sales-again-itat-mumbai-rules-against-double-taxation-of-turnover/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
