Applicability of Section 54F Where Assessee Holds a Jointly-Owned Residential Property

Applicability of Section 54F Where Assessee Holds a Jointly-Owned Residential Property   ITAT Delhi recently in the case of Kusum Sahgal v. ACIT – ITAT Delhi Bench-Assessment Year: 2015–16, Order Date: 08.11.2023 was having an interesting issue as to whether exemption under Section 54F can be denied merely because the assessee holds a joint ownership… […]

Lack of definitive quantum of escapement and change of opinion: Gujarat HC held reopening invalid

Lack of definitive quantum of escapement and change of opinion: Gujarat HC held reopening invalid   The assessee had recorded purchases of ₹58.05 crore from Ruchita Chemicals LLP, which were thoroughly examined and accepted in the original assessment under Section 143(3). From these funds, Ruchita Chemicals LLP advanced ₹7 crore to M/s Invent Asset Securitization and Reconstruction… […]

Section 153C arises only upon timely recording of satisfaction. If this foundational step is delayed without justification, subsequent actions lose legal validity: Gujarat HC

Section 153C arises only upon timely recording of satisfaction. If this foundational step is delayed without justification, subsequent actions lose legal validity: Gujarat HC   The recent judgment of the Gujarat High Court in Parag Rameshbhai Gathani vs. Income-tax Officer (18 November 2025) is an important reaffirmation of the procedural discipline required in search-related proceedings… […]

Raipur ITAT on Penny Stock Addition: Not permissible mechanically without any direct evidence showing the assessee’s involvement in rigging or providing/receiving accommodation entries

Raipur ITAT on Penny Stock Addition: Not permissible mechanically without any direct evidence showing the assessee’s involvement in rigging or providing/receiving accommodation entries   A recent decision of the ITAT Raipur in Anju Parekh vs. ITO (20 November 2025) offers important clarity on assessments involving alleged penny-stock transactions. The assessee had carried out purchase and… […]